Many warned about Trudeau, Many are doing the same for Mark Carney, will Canada listen this time?

‘s comment/summary:

Canada has spent 10 years sufferring under the very leadership that Mark Carney encapsulates, he is Trudeau 2.0 on steroids: morally bankrupt, more determined, heavily connected, and an extreme climate zealot where he believes you must suffer “for his vision which would potentially lead to a less free, less prosperous society under the guise of environmental salvation”.

FLASHBACK ARTICLE from 2021 that has gone viral over the last few months – but it’s a whopper, so lets summarize: “Peter Foster: Mark Carney, man of destiny, arises to revolutionize society. It won’t be pleasant” from the National Post in point form:

• Mark Carney’s Vision: Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of Canada and Bank of England, sees himself as a “man of destiny” driven to revolutionize society. He believes Western society is morally corrupt due to capitalism, which he claims has led to a “climate emergency” threatening life on Earth.
• Technocratic Dictatorship: Carney’s ultimate aim is perceived as establishing a technocratic dictatorship, justified by climate alarmism. His philosophy involves rigid controls over personal freedom, industry, and corporate funding to combat what he describes as a climate emergency.
• Influence and Roles: Carney holds influential positions such as UN Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance, and he advises both British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau on climate issues.

• Carney draws inspiration from historical figures like Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin

  Philosophical Influences: Carney draws inspiration from historical figures like Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, and contemporary thinkers like Michael Sandel. He advocates for a form of “stakeholder capitalism” where the private sector becomes a partner in reshaping society.

• Climate and Economic Control: He has been instrumental in creating organizations like the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) and pushes for “sustainable finance” to influence economic activities towards climate goals, potentially at the expense of traditional industries like fossil fuels.
• Criticism of Capitalism: Carney criticizes capitalism for its moral failings, advocating for a society where values are not determined by commercial interests but by broader societal and environmental concerns. He promotes concepts like Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria.
• Great Reset and Green New Deal: Since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, Carney has been a key figure in promoting the “Great Reset,” “Green New Deal,” or “Building Back Better,” suggesting these crises provide an opportunity for significant societal transformation.

• Carney envisions a world where economic activities are heavily regulated for environmental reasons

  Impact on Society: His vision includes a future of constrained choice, reduced consumption of resources like meat, less travel, and potentially higher poverty levels, as he envisions a world where economic activities are heavily regulated for environmental reasons.

• Critique on His Approach: The article criticizes Carney for misdirection in his arguments, using scare tactics, and for his vision potentially leading to a less free, less prosperous society under the guise of environmental salvation.

This summary encapsulates the key points from Peter Foster’s critique of Mark Carney’s agenda, highlighting the contentious nature of his proposed societal transformation. ~AISummary